To be the guy who responds to footnote 15: it hardly seems to be shooting yourself in the foot to suggest a reduction in migration might ease the problems with obtaining housing that you describe. As you acknowledge elsewhere in the piece, this is about trade-offs. Surely the reasonable position is the tailor an immigration policy to cap…
To be the guy who responds to footnote 15: it hardly seems to be shooting yourself in the foot to suggest a reduction in migration might ease the problems with obtaining housing that you describe. As you acknowledge elsewhere in the piece, this is about trade-offs. Surely the reasonable position is the tailor an immigration policy to capture the benefits of migration while mitigating against the boost to housing demand it entails?
To be the guy who responds to footnote 15: it hardly seems to be shooting yourself in the foot to suggest a reduction in migration might ease the problems with obtaining housing that you describe. As you acknowledge elsewhere in the piece, this is about trade-offs. Surely the reasonable position is the tailor an immigration policy to capture the benefits of migration while mitigating against the boost to housing demand it entails?