OFCOM are currently consulting on changes to the Universal Service mandate, but they try and guide you through a very restricted set of questions without allowing for the idea that maybe there should be some public payback element for the massive subsidy they will get from reducing the second class deliveries
I would like my template for my "On making house building administrative planning systems 🔥SEXY🔥" article draft, which currently has the subheading "We largely agree that we need to 'build more bloody houses', but what comes next? Engaging with your local authority at an incredibly detailed level! Strap in. This is mandatory fun." is going to draw heavily on this. Will obviously link, but is this okay with you boss?
Forgive me, sounds like an intriguing piece (please send me a link!) but I’m not sure what you’re asking here? Suspect you might be thinking of Jonn Elledge who coined the BMBH catchphrase!
OFCOM are currently consulting on changes to the Universal Service mandate, but they try and guide you through a very restricted set of questions without allowing for the idea that maybe there should be some public payback element for the massive subsidy they will get from reducing the second class deliveries
100% agree - big opportunity for a quid-pro-quo here.
I would like my template for my "On making house building administrative planning systems 🔥SEXY🔥" article draft, which currently has the subheading "We largely agree that we need to 'build more bloody houses', but what comes next? Engaging with your local authority at an incredibly detailed level! Strap in. This is mandatory fun." is going to draw heavily on this. Will obviously link, but is this okay with you boss?
Forgive me, sounds like an intriguing piece (please send me a link!) but I’m not sure what you’re asking here? Suspect you might be thinking of Jonn Elledge who coined the BMBH catchphrase!
That's because it was a half formed thought I flung in your direction. I will return today when I have brain capacity